YY markYY Method™ · Home Edition v2.3
MethodViolinCases & ADRsBen Chan
← Case Studies/Case #012/C12-041
C12-041DecidedDefensive Judgment and First ResponseCross-cutting2026-07-17

Put Deterministic Authorization Beneath Probabilistic Intake

The AI may gather context conversationally.

Freshness
Permanent

Permanent. Revisit if launch evidence, teacher feedback, user behavior, corpus quality, or safety review materially changes this decision.

#defensive-judgment#put#violin-stand-partner

Capture

  1. AI gathers observations.
  2. User confirms relevant facts.
  3. A reviewed Compact establishes possible eligibility.
  4. A deterministic tree controls permitted action.
  5. The user performs or declines.
  6. The system records result and reroutes.

The AI may gather context conversationally. Concrete physical authorization must be bounded by deterministic logic.

Why

Generative AI is useful for language and clarification but should not improvise the final physical action boundary.

Conversational intake may be probabilistic. Concrete authorization is bounded and deterministic.

Why-Not


Commit

Decision: The AI may gather context conversationally. Concrete physical authorization must be bounded by deterministic logic.

Conversational intake may be probabilistic. Concrete authorization is bounded and deterministic.

Public boundary: This ADR publishes the judgment and product boundary while withholding exact prompts, routes, thresholds, schemas, tests, and other reproducible implementation details where applicable.

Confidence: Medium-high for public architecture; implementation details remain private and subject to launch evidence.

Timestamp

2026-07-17

C12-040Case #012 RegistryC12-042
Human captures. AI reads.benchantech.com · yymethod.com